Both Expo and React Native are popular tools for building mobile apps using JavaScript/React. React Native is Facebook's core framework for building native mobile apps, while Expo is a set of tools and services built on top of React Native that makes development easier. Expo provides a simpler way to start and test apps but with some limitations, while React Native gives complete control but requires more setup and native development knowledge.
Expo provides a set of pre-built components and a CLI to simplify the development process, while React Native provides a more low-level API for building native mobile apps.
Both Expo and React Native support TypeScript, but Expo provides better integration and tooling out of the box.
Not applicable, as both packages are for mobile app development.
Expo depends on React Native, and both packages have a large number of dependencies, including JavaScript libraries and native modules.
Both packages provide good performance, but Expo's pre-built components and optimized builds can result in better performance in some cases.
Expo is built on top of React Native and provides a set of pre-built components and tools, while React Native is a framework for building native mobile apps.
Both packages have large and active communities, with many contributors and maintainers.
Both packages have good documentation, but Expo's documentation is more comprehensive and easier to follow.
Both packages are actively maintained, with regular updates and bug fixes.
1import React from 'react';
2import { Text, View } from 'react-native';
3export default function App() {
4 return (
5 <View>
6 <Text>Hello, World!</Text>
7 </View>
8 );
9}
This code creates a simple 'Hello World' app using Expo and React Native.
1import React from 'react';
2import { AppRegistry, Text, View } from 'react-native';
3const App = () => {
4 return (
5 <View>
6 <Text>Hello, World!</Text>
7 </View>
8 );
9};
10AppRegistry.registerComponent('App', () => App);
This code creates a simple 'Hello World' app using React Native.
Expo is a good choice for developers who want to build cross-platform apps with a set of pre-built components and a CLI, while React Native is a good choice for developers who want more control over the native modules and APIs.
A framework for building native mobile apps with JavaScript, TypeScript, Angular, or Vue.js. NativeScript gives direct access to native platform APIs without requiring Objective-C, Swift, or Java knowledge.
NativeScript is very similar to React Native as it lets you build real native apps with JavaScript. It's a good alternative if you prefer Angular or Vue over React, or want more direct access to native APIs.
Mobile App Development FrameworkA framework for building mobile and desktop apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Ionic lets you write code once and run it on multiple platforms including iOS and Android.
Like Expo and React Native, Ionic helps build mobile apps but uses regular web technologies that many developers already know. It's easier to learn for web developers since it uses standard HTML and CSS instead of native components.
Mobile App Development FrameworkWhile not an NPM package (it uses Dart), Flutter is a popular alternative for building mobile apps. It creates beautiful, native apps for both iOS and Android from a single codebase.
Flutter is becoming very popular because it's fast and makes really smooth apps. While it uses a different language (Dart), it's worth considering if you're looking at React Native because it solves the same problems.
Mobile App Development FrameworkA tool that helps turn web apps into mobile apps that can run on phones. It's like a bridge that lets your web app use phone features like the camera or GPS.
Capacitor is simpler than React Native because you can use your existing web development skills. It's perfect for teams who want to turn their website into a mobile app without learning a completely new framework.
Mobile App Development BridgeNo README available